resend add missing glyph code to GetGlyphIndices

[Jeff Latimer]

Andreas Mohr wrote:

>This should have gone into a comment right there because it's
>a very normal reaction to immediately question code like that,
>so the code should properly defend itself by default ;)
>
>IOW just the usual "do coding as obvious as possible, then properly comment
>everything else that isn't obvious".
>
>Maybe something like
>/* called in a loop, but missing glyph shouldn't happen often
>   so we don't want to call it outside the loop, always */
>
>Andreas Mohr
>
>  
>
Makes sense now that you mention it.

Jeff Latimer